ea
PPP a,
Bo DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BIE \U/LEN
sb BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
my es: meee WR . , sae
Bug OE? bi 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1007
oe, ae ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. NR3418-14
12 Nov 14
Thig is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC i552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 November 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1070 MMRP-13/MOD of 8
Aug 14, a copy of which is attached.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are sucn
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
‘prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
Docket No. NR3418-14
‘eial naval record, the burden is on
he existence of probable material
Sincerely,
Gh A YD “7
LS
Actr
Enclosure: HQMC memo 1070 MMRP-13/MOD of 8 Aug 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7887 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQOMC Memo 1070 MMRP-13 of 20 May 14, a copy of which is attached. NR7887-13 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7008 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO7008-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5890 14
WRO5890-14 28 October 2014 This is in reference to your appiication for correction to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6453 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5990 14
NR5990-14 hh Under these circumstances, the Board found that no reli is warranted. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable ma erial error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5872 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1272 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1070 MMRP-13 of 5 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3337 14
COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO3337-14 10 October 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section L552 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3450 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 4 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR3450-14 ay 4 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to iemanieaee the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3974 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased father’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR3974-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...